Douglas Christie – L’avocat qui a dénoncé les « experts de l’Holocauste »

Douglas Christie

 

Le 24 avril 1946, l’avocat canadien Douglas Christie, qui a consacré sa vie à défendre une vérité opprimée, est né. Christie est surtout connu pour ses contre-interrogatoires lors du procès Zundel.

Nommez l’historien juif Raul Hilberg, et les médias de masse diront à l’unisson « le meilleur expert du monde sur l’Holocauste ». Mentionnez Rudolf Vrba, et les mêmes médias le décriront comme l’auteur de l’un des éléments de preuve importants que l’Holocauste a vraiment eu lieu. Ceux qu’ils ne mentionneront pas, c’est l’avocat Douglas Christie, qui a montré lors de son contre-interrogatoire de ces deux experts que leur preuve était des mensonges.

Douglas Christie est né le 24 avril 1946 dans une ferme à Winnipeg, au Canada. Déjà à l’âge de 12 ans, il a décidé de devenir avocat. Son père a écrit comment le jeune Douglas pouvait lire des documents juridiques compliqués, mais en même temps, il aimait l’air frais, et il lui a donc demandé s’il voulait être avocat ou agriculteur. « J’ai répondu que si je deviens avocat, je peux toujours devenir agriculteur plus tard, mais si je deviens agriculteur, je ne peux pas devenir avocat plus tard, alors j’ai choisi de devenir avocat », avait répondu Christie. En 1970, Christie a obtenu son diplôme en droit de la Faculté de droit de l’Université de la Colombie-Britannique. À cette époque, il avait également suivi une formation en sciences politiques et en philosophie.

 

Douglas Christie

 

Le travail de Christie en tant qu’avocat en est venu à tourner autour de la défense du droit d’autrui à la liberté d’expression. La plus grande partie de ce travail a été effectuée dans la salle d’audience, mais il a également parlé et écrit des articles sur l’importance de la liberté d’expression, et il a également été le fondateur de la Ligue canadienne pour la liberté d’expression. Étant lui-même d’origine écossaise, il se référait souvent aux combattants de la liberté écossais en relation avec la volonté des Écossais de sacrifier leur vie pour la liberté.

Christie croyait que la liberté était menacée par un système répressif. De plus, l’État oppressif – sous la forme de fondateurs de lois oppressives – a « dans la grande majorité des cas une machine médiatique volontaire qui, avec son énorme influence, bien avant un procès, peut préparer le public, y compris un juri potentiel, à atteindre le résultat souhaité ». Pendant la plus grande partie de sa vie, Christie a constamment plaidé contre les lois qui suppriment la parole libre et pour la liberté individuelle. Il a décrit son choix comme suit :

« L’État ressemble de plus en plus au Big Brother de George Orwell. La religion du nouvel État est inscrite dans les livres de droit et punira tous les hérétiques avec des amendes ou des peines d’emprisonnement ou des taxes punitives. L’État grandit tandis que l’individu rétrécit. La créativité et même la vérité sont étouffées. Quelqu’un doit défendre la liberté. J’ai essayé d’être cette personne. J’ai volontiers défendu ces dissidents qui osent protester contre la tyrannie. Je leur ai promis que tant que je le pourrai, ils ne seront pas seuls. Enfant, j’ai fait le même choix : contre les voyous de la cour de récréation, et pour leurs victimes. »

Le premier dissident que Christie a défendu dans le rôle d’avocat était l’enseignant James Keegstra. Il a perdu son emploi et son permis d’enseignant en 1983, et a été accusé d’avoir enseigné à ses étudiants que les Juifs « ont créé l’Holocauste par sympathie ». Il a également parlé ouvertement de l’implication des Juifs dans le système bancaire. Christie a défendu Keegstra jusqu’au plus haut tribunal du Canada dans une affaire qui a reçu beaucoup d’attention.

Christie défendra plus tard plusieurs personnes dont la liberté est menacée. Il a défendu Paul Fromm, qui a été licencié de son travail d’enseignant en raison de son activité politique dans ses temps libres, et le journaliste Doug Collins, qui a été assigné à comparaître par le Tribunal des droits de la personne de la Colombie-Britannique pour avoir « nié l’Holocauste » dans sa chronique dans le journal The Daily Victorian. Entre autres choses, Collins avait décrit le film hollywoodien « La Liste de Schindler » comme de la propagande et l’avait appelé « Swindler’s Wish ».

Les plus grands coups portés à la vérité et à la liberté d’expression ont frappé Douglas Christie lors du procès d’Ernst Zundel en 1985. Le professeur juif Rudolf Vrba, auteur du Protocole d’Auchwitz, et Raul Hilberg, « le meilleur expert mondial de l’Holocauste », avaient été appelés par le procureur à témoigner contre le révisionniste historique Zundel. Par conséquent, ces deux éléments pourraient être contre-interrogés par Douglas Christie. Le procès, qui a duré deux mois, est devenu historique lorsque l’Holocauste a été ouvertement débattu pour la première fois entre les croyants de l’Holocauste et les révisionnistes appelés par les procureurs et les avocats de la défense dans l’affaire.

Au cours du contre-interrogatoire, Christie a amené Rudolf Vrba, qui avait écrit l’un des documents les plus importants préconisant que l’Holocauste aurait dû avoir lieu, à reconnaître qu’il avait utilisé la « licentia poetarum » (la liberté du poète) dans l’écriture de son livre. Il a également été forcé de reconnaître que la preuve de l’existence de chambres à gaz était quelque chose que Vrba avait « entendu d’autres personnes ».

 

Rudolf Vrba

 

Raul Hilberg a finalement reconnu, après les mises sur le gril de Douglas Christie, qu’il n’y avait aucune preuve technique que l’Holocauste avait vraiment eu lieu. Hilberg, dans son ouvrage « La destruction des Juifs européens », un ouvrage standard pour la recherche sur l’Holocauste, avait affirmé qu’Adolf Hitler avait donné deux ordres pour l’extermination des Juifs, mais lors du contre-interrogatoire, il n’a pas pu prouver cette affirmation du tout.

Lorsque le professeur Robert Faurisson, qui a aidé Christie dans le procès, a voulu voir ces ordres présumés, Hilberg a reconnu qu’il n’y en avait pas. Au lieu de cela, au cours du contre-interrogatoire de Christie, Hilberg s’en est tenu à la position selon laquelle l’Holocauste avait été réalisé sans plan, organisation centrale ou budget, mais qu’au lieu de cela , « une incroyable rencontre des esprits, une lecture consensuelle de l’esprit par une bureaucratie lointaine » avait été développée parmi les Allemands.

Douglas Christie a réussi à faire acquitter Ernst Zundel et est maintenant salué par tous les révisionnistes de l’histoire, et d’autres défenseurs de la vérité, pour son engagement en faveur de la liberté d’expression. Alors que les médias continueront à présenter Raul Hilberg et Rudolf Vrba comme des « autorités », de plus en plus de gens entendront parler de la façon dont leurs affirmations ont été révélées par un avocat nommé Douglas Christie.

Le 11 mars 2013, Douglas Christie est décédé d’un cancer. Il avait 66 ans.

 

 

Douglas Christie – L’avocat qui a dénoncé les « experts de l’Holocauste » - Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

IG Auschwitz production complex where Auschwitz prisoners worked (1941 under construction)

 

Almost everyone has heard of Auschwitz (in the West, Auschwitz is called Auschwitz), the German concentration camp of World War 2, where masses of prisoners — mostly Jews — were allegedly exterminated in the gas chambers. Widely believed, Auschwitz is the most horrific Nazi extermination center. However, the camp's terrible reputation does not match the facts.

 

Scholars disagree with Holocaust history

To the surprise of many, more and more historians and engineers are questioning the universally accepted history of Auschwitz. These "revisionist" scholars do not deny the fact that a large number of Jews were deported to this camp, or that many died there, especially from typhus and other diseases. However, the compelling evidence they present proves that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the stories of mass murder in the "gas chambers" are a myth.

IG-Farbenwerke Auschwitz. A Ukrainian welder at work.
Photo: Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2007-0075

Auschwitz Camps

The Auschwitz camp complex was established in 1940 in the central-southern part of Poland. Between 1942 and mid-1944, many Jews were deported there.

 

The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau or Auschwitz II was supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz or Auschwitz III was a major industrial center for the production of gasoline from coal. In addition, they were adjacent to dozens of smaller camps that worked for the war economy.

 

Four million victims?

At the post-war Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies claimed that the Germans had exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, invented by the Soviet Communists, has been uncritically accepted for many years. For example, she often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines. [one]

 

Today, no serious historian, even those who generally accept the history of extermination, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it was time to finally admit that the well-known figure of four million was a deliberate myth. In July 1990, the State Museum of Auschwitz in Poland, along with the Israeli Holocaust center Yad Vashem, suddenly announced that in total, probably one million people (Jews and non-Jews) had died there. None of these institutions said how many of them were actually killed, nor was the estimated number of people supposedly gassed. [2] Renowned Holocaust historian Gerald Reitlinger estimates that approximately 700,000 Jews perished in Auschwitz. Recently, Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac estimated that about 800,000 people died in Auschwitz, of which 630,000 were Jews. While even these downwardly corrected figures continue to be incorrect, they show that the history of Auschwitz has changed enormously over time.

A manger in Auschwitz. Photo Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-2007-0085

Ridiculous stories

At one time, it was most seriously stated that Jews were systematically killed by electric shocks in Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing the testimony of a Soviet eyewitness from the liberated Auschwitz, told their readers in February 1945 that the methodical Germans killed Jews there using "an electric conveyor belt, on which hundreds of people could be electrocuted at the same time, and then transported to ovens. They burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage fields." [four]

 

In addition, at the Nuremberg Tribunal, the chief US prosecutor, Robert Jackson, alleged that the Germans used "a newly invented device that allows you to instantly 'evaporate' 20,000 Jews in Auschwitz, while leaving no trace of them." [5] No prominent historian today takes such fictional stories seriously.

On the stage of the theater in Auschwitz, a variety and circus group performs in front of the prisoners. Photo: Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2007-0097

"Confession" Hess

 

The key Holocaust document is the April 5, 1946 "confession" of the former commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hess, presented by the US Prosecution at the main Nuremberg Trials. [6]

 

While it is still widely cited as undeniable proof that Auschwitz was an extermination camp, the claim was in fact a falsehood obtained under torture.

 

Many years after the war, British military intelligence officer Bernard Clark told how he and five other British soldiers tortured the former commandant, extracting a "confession" from him. Hess himself explained his torment in the following words: “Yes, of course, I signed a statement that I killed 2.5 million Jews. I could just as well say that there were 5 million of these Jews. There are ways by which you can get any confession whether it's true or not." [7]

 

Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story today admit that many of Hess's "sworn" claims are simply lies. For this reason alone, no serious historian-scholar today claims that 2.5 or 3 million people died in Auschwitz.

 

In addition, Hess's "affidavit" states that Jews were exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 in three other camps: Belzek, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolseck" camp mentioned by Hess is a complete fabrication. Such a camp has never existed, and its name is no longer mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, those who believe in the Holocaust legend now claim that the gassing of Jews began in Auschwitz, Treblinka and Belzek only in 1942.

Residential sector in the barracks of Auschwitz. Photo: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2007-0078

Lack of documentary evidence

After the war, the Allies confiscated many thousands of secret German documents relating to Auschwitz. None of them mentions a plan or program of extermination. When it comes to facts, the story of the extermination cannot be reconciled with documentary evidence.

 

Unemployed Jewish prisoners

Dental office in the Auschwitz camp.
It employed the best Jewish doctorsPhoto: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2007-0083

It is often claimed that all Jews who were unable to work were immediately killed in Auschwitz. Old, young, sick, or weakened Jews are said to have been gassed as soon as they arrived, and those temporarily left to live were worked to death.

 

However, in fact, the evidence shows that a very large percentage of the Jewish prisoners were unable to work and yet were not killed. For example, in a telegram dated September 4, 1943, from the head of the Human Resources Section of the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office (WVHA), it was reported that out of 25,000 Jewish prisoners in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and the rest of the Jewish prisoners - approximately 21,500 or about 86% were disabled. [eight]

 

This was also confirmed in a secret report on "security measures at Auschwitz" dated April 5, 1944, by the Chief of the SS Concentration Camp System, Oswald Pohl, sent to the Head of the SS, Heinrich Himmler. Paul reported that there were 67,000 prisoners in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of which 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination center, there were 36,000 prisoners, mostly women, of whom "approximately 15,000 were incapacitated." [9]

These two documents simply don't fit with the story of the Auschwitz extermination.

 

Evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was set up primarily as a camp for Jews who were unable to work, including the sick and old, as well as those who were waiting to be sent to other camps. This conclusion was reached by Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for the unusually high death rate there. [ten]

 

Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish, admits in a recent book on the "Final Solution" that more Jews died in Auschwitz from typhus and other "natural" causes than were executed. [eleven]

Dormitories (as the photo is signed in the original) in Auschwitz. Above is not a gallows, but a canopy over the entrance to the barracks , a sleeping building. The purpose of the item with the handle (on the right) is not clear. Photo: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2007-0092

Anne Frank

Probably the most famous prisoner of Auschwitz was Anne Frank, who became famous all over the world thanks to her famous diary. However, few people know that thousands of Jews, including Anna and her father Otto Frank, "survived" Auschwitz.

 

This 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from Holland to Auschwitz in September 1944. A few weeks later, in view of the advance of the Soviet army, Anna, along with many other Jews, was evacuated to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March 1945.

 

Her father contracted typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp hospital for treatment. He was one of the thousands of sick and weakened Jews left there by the Germans when they left the camp in January 1945, shortly before it was taken over by Soviet troops. He died in Switzerland in 1980.

 

If the Germans had planned to kill Anne Frank and her father, they would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, though tragic, is inconsistent with the history of extermination.

 

Allied propaganda

 

The stories of gassing at Auschwitz are largely based on oral statements by former Jewish prisoners who themselves did not personally see evidence of the extermination. Their claims are understandable, since rumors of gassing at Auschwitz were widespread.

 

Allied planes dropped a huge number of leaflets in Polish and German on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas, which claimed that people were being gassed in this camp. The gas story of Auschwitz, which was an important part of the Allied war propaganda, was also broadcast over the radio to Europe. [12]

Auschwitz dining room. Photo: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2007-0087

Auschwitz: Kitchen - cooking shop and cooking area. Photo: Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2007-0086

Testimony of survivors

 

Former prisoners confirmed that they saw no evidence of the extermination at Auschwitz.

 

Austrian Maria Fanherwaarden testified in Toronto District Court in March 1988 about her time at Auschwitz. She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for sexual intercourse with a Polish prisoner. As she was being taken by train to the camp, a gypsy woman told her and others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz.

 

Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were told to undress and go to a spacious concrete room with no windows and shower. The horrified women thought that they would be killed now. However, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.

 

Maria confirmed that Auschwitz was not a resort. She witnessed the death of many prisoners from diseases, especially from typhus, some even committed suicide. But she saw no evidence of massacres, no gassing, no evidence of any plan of extermination being carried out. [13]

 

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were allegedly gassed and burned daily. She also testified after the war that she did not see or hear anything about the "gas chambers" during the time she was there. She heard "gas" stories only later. [fourteen]

The Ukrainian women's folk choir performs on the stage of the camp theater in Auschwitz.
Photo: Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2007-0096

Released prisoners

Auschwitz prisoners who had served their sentences were released and returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz were actually a secret extermination center, the Germans certainly wouldn't be releasing prisoners who "knew" what was going on in the camp. [fifteen]

 

Himmler orders to reduce mortality

In response to the increase in deaths among prisoners as a result of disease, especially from typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps took tough measures to combat diseases.

 

The head of the SS Camp Administration sent a directive dated 28 December 1942 to Auschwitz and other concentration camps. It sharply criticized the high death rate of prisoners due to disease and ordered that "camp doctors should use all means at their disposal to reduce the death rate in the camps." Moreover, the directive provided that:

 

The camp doctors should check the food of the prisoners more often than in the past and, together with the administration, make recommendations to the camp commandants... The camp doctors should see to it that working conditions and workplaces are improved as much as possible.

 

Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfuehrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate must be absolutely reduced." [16]

 

Internal regulations of German camps

The official internal regulations of the German camps clearly show that Auschwitz was not an extermination center. These rules included the following provisions: [17]

Those arriving at the camp must undergo a thorough medical examination, and in case of doubt [about their health] must be quarantined for observation.

Prisoners complaining of being unwell must be examined by the camp doctor on the same day. If necessary, the doctor must take the prisoner to a hospital for professional treatment.

The camp doctor should regularly inspect the kitchen to check the preparation of the food and the quality of the food. Report any deficiencies to the camp commandant.

Particular attention should be paid to the treatment of victims of accidents so that the productivity of prisoners is not reduced.

Prisoners to be released and transferred must first be examined by the camp doctor.

Aerial photography

In 1979, the CIA released detailed photographs of Auschwitz-Birkenau taken over several days during aerial reconnaissance in 1944 (in the midst of an alleged extermination there). These photographs do not reveal any traces of either mountains of corpses, or smoking chimneys of crematoria, or crowds of Jews awaiting death - all that supposedly happened there. If Auschwitz were the extermination center, as claimed, then all these signs of extermination would be clearly visible in the photographs. [eighteen]

 

Absurd allegations related to cremation

Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could not have been cremated daily at Auschwitz during the spring and summer of 1944, as is commonly claimed.

 

For example, Ivan Lagas, director of a large crematorium in Calgary, Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation stories were technically impossible. The claim that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned daily at Auschwitz in crematoria and open mines in the summer of 1944 is simply "absurd" and "completely unrealistic," he declared under oath. [19]

 

Gas chamber specialist refutes extermination story

Leading American expert on the gas chambers, Boston engineer Fred Leuchter, carefully examined the alleged "gas chambers" in Poland and concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story was absurd and technically impossible.

 

Leichter is one of the leading experts in the design and installation of gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals. For example, he designed the gas chambers for the Missouri penitentiaries.

 

In February 1988, he carried out a detailed on-site survey in Poland of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, still standing or only partly destroyed. In his deposition before the Toronto City Court and in his technical report, Leichter detailed every aspect of his research.

 

He stated that he had come to the convinced conclusion that the alleged gas installations could not have been used to kill people. Among other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were not tightly closed and ventilated and would inevitably poison the German camp personnel if these "gas chambers" were used to kill people. [twenty]

 

Dr. William B. Lindsay, a 33-year research chemist at the DuPont Corporation, also testified in court in 1985 that the Auschwitz gassing stories were technically impossible. On the basis of a thorough examination at the site of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, and on the basis of his professional experience and knowledge, he stated: "I have come to the conclusion that no one was killed in this way with Zyklon B (hydrogen cyanide gas) deliberately or intentionally. I find it absolutely impossible." [21]

 

Conclusion

The story of the extermination of people in Auschwitz was a product of military propaganda. More than 40 years after the end of the 2nd World War, it is necessary to take a more objective look at this chapter of history that causes such conflicting opinions. The Auschwitz legend is at the heart of the Holocaust story. If no one systematically killed hundreds of thousands of Jews there, as is claimed, then this means that one of the biggest myths of our time has collapsed.

 

The artificial maintenance of the hatred and emotions of the past prevents genuine reconciliation and lasting peace from being achieved. Revisionism promotes the development of historical consciousness and international understanding. That is why the work of the History Revision Institute is so important and deserves your support.

Mark Weber

History Revision Institute

Notes

1. Nuremberg document 008-USSR. IMT blue series, Vol. 39, pp. 241, 261.; NC and A red series, vol. 1, p. 35.; C.L. Sulzberger, "Oswiecim Killings Placed at 4,000,000," New York Times, May 8, 1945, and, New York Times, Jan. 31, 1986, p. A4. 
2. Y. Bauer, "Fighting the Distortions," Jerusalem Post (Israel), Sept. 22, 1989; "Auschwitz Deaths Reduced to a Million," Daily Telegraph (London), July 17, 1990; "Poland Reduces Auschwitz Death Toll Estimate to 1 Million," The Washington Times, July 17, 1990.
3. G. Reitlinger, The Final Solution (1971); J.-C. Pressac, Le Cr¦matoires d'Auschwitz: La Machinerie du meurtre de mass (Paris: CNRS, 1993). On Pressac's estimates, see: L'Express (France), Sept. 30, 1993, p. 33.
4. Washington (DC) Daily News, Feb. 2, 1945, pp. 2, 35. (United Press dispatch from Moscow).
5. IMT blue series, Vol. 16, p. 529-530. (June 21, 1946).
6. Nuremberg document 3868-PS (USA-819). IMT blue series, Vol. 33, pp. 275-279.
7. Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England: 1983), pp. 235; R. Faurisson, The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 389-403.
8. Archives of the Jewish Historical Institute of Warsaw, German document No. 128, in: H. Eschwege, ed., Kennzeichen J (East Berlin: 1966), p. 264.
9. Nuremberg document NO-021. NMT green series, Vol. 5.pp. 384-385.
10. Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (Costa Mesa, Calif.), p. 124.
11. Arno Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The 'Final Solution' in History (Pantheon, 1989), p. 365.
12. Nuremberg document NI-11696. NMT green series, Vol. 8, p. 606.
13. Testimony in Toronto District Court, March 28, 1988. Toronto Star, March 29, 1988, p. A2.
14. Sylvia Rothchild, ed., Voices from the Holocaust (New York: 1981), pp. 188-191.
15. Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1981), p. 169.
16. Nuremberg document PS-2171, Annex 2. NC&A red series, Vol. 4, pp. 833-834.
17. "Rules and Regulations for the Concentration Camps." Anthology, Inhuman Medicine, Vol. 1, Part 1 (Warsaw: International Auschwitz Committee, 1970), pp. 149-151.; S. Paskuly, ed., Death Dealer: the Memoirs of the SS Kommandant at Auschwitz (Buffalo: 1992), pp. 216-217.
18. Dino A. Brugioni and Robert C. Poirier, The Holocaust Revisited (Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1979).
19. Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), April 14, 1988, p. 6.
20. The Leuchter Report: An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek (Toronto: 1988). Available for $17.00, postpaid, from the IHR.
21. The Globe and Mail (Toronto), Feb. 12, 1985, p. M3

 

Translation from English

Sergei Anglinov 

 

Source :
http://rus-sky.org/history/library/articles/veber.php

 

 

 

Mark Weber is the editor of the Journal of Historical Review, published by the Historical Revisionist Institute six times a year. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich, the University of Portland and Indiana University (master's degree in 1977). For five days in March 1988, he testified as a recognized expert on the "Final Solution" and the Holocaust in a trial in Toronto District Court. He is the author of many articles, reviews and essays on various issues of contemporary European history. Weber also appeared on numerous radio broadcasts and on the national television program Montel Williams.

See also:

How Boris Polevoy, a war correspondent for Pravda, became a false witness to the Holocaust in 1945 - Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)

The gas chamber at Auschwitz was never used - Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)

Thies Christophersen. Lies about Auschwitz
So was the Holocaust really?
An inconvenient truth. Destroying the Holocaust Myth
Why don't I believe in the Holocaust?
Auschwitz comme religion - Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)

Initiative contre la germanophobie - Partie 2 - Les camps de la mort "nazis" soviétiques (holo-faux.blogspot.com)

 

Source : Auschwitz : mythes et faits (holocaustrevisionism.blogspot.com)

EXCLUSIVE MANIFESTO - The Swiss National Front enrols!

The Swiss National Front enrols!

Christian values - National Socialist ideal

 

Fundamental political program of the Swiss and European National Front for the Defense of Race and Culture (FNSEDRC) and membership.

 

 

 

 

Membership    

 

 

Open to Europeans of Latin, Germanic, Slavic, Anglo-Saxon race and culture.

 

     

Exclusion

 

 

 

     

     - Mestizo   

     - Jews

     - Pagans

     - Marxist deviants

 

 

Full membership

 

 

 

 

Independence of Europe

 

Who does not fight the ideas of Christianity (speech 1928)

 

Who considers Adolf Hitler as the messiah of the Aryans

 

 

Composition

 

In its ideal composition the Swiss and European National Front for the Defense of Race and Culture (FNSEDRC) is a predominantly French and Latin movement.

 

 

God commands us to be strong and courageous

 

 

Joshua 1:9 

"I have commanded you to be strong and courageous. Do not tremble, do not be afraid, for I, the LORD your God, will be with you wherever you go."

 

 

The Führer demands!

 

 

 

Comrade, never forget that you are an exponent and representative of the National Socialist Movement and our Weltanschauung.

The foreigner will form an opinion about the Movement according to the impression he gets of you. Therefore, be a National Socialist in all your actions, in everything you do and do not do!  (...)

For others, be an example of courage, discipline and dedication. (...)

As a man, be diligent, hardworking and modest. (...)

In everything you do, act as if you carry the future of the entire nation on your shoulders. (...)

As a leader, be responsible in the execution of your duties and be determined in the transmission of instructions. (...)

Never forget that for a nation, freedom is the greatest good in the world. (...)

If you fight for the National Socialist German Workers' Party you are fighting for your people.

Adolf Hitler

Munich, January 9, 1927

 

 

Our movement is popular

 

 

 

 We respect everyone

 

We respect everyone, but we love only ourselves.

 

 

We are the substitute for God and Nature

 

 

 

Whites are the last evolutionary branch of humanity and we have been selected by the Divine to replace all previous types of humans, and to continue to evolve into a new human species that will no longer produce viable offspring with the other types of humans while they still exist - before we totally replace them in the fullness of time as the new type of humans. We must serve one master - God. We must obey what He wants. We are His only selected species. God does not speak in riddles and He tells us exactly what He wants through those He has touched. We must be a separate species at all times and not mix or mate with non-whites. It is not salvation we need, but evolution. - (Whiteness over all. Divinely inspired messages to Arman, as reported to H. Millard).

 

----

Our Cause - William Pierce

We must prepare ourselves mentally and spiritually for a very long, bloody, and excruciating struggle.

Before the first shot is fired, we must build our invasion fleet with thousands of ships and siege engines. 

In other words, we must prepare for our political struggle before we can count on it, which has nothing to do with the invariable failure that has rewarded patriots in the past. We must build a foundation that will sustain us for a very long campaign.

 

 

Return of non-Western populations

 

 

 

 

When a country becomes multiracial, it begins to lose its edge in all areas that require technical competence, philosophical skill, or a high degree of spiritual development.

----

 

We need another Adolf Hitler. Or rather, we need several dozen of them, to sweep away all those betrayers of the potential for greatness in life.

 

 

Our leader Leon!

 

 

 

Léon Joseph Marie Ignace Degrelle (1906 Bouillon - 1994 Malaga) - Creator of Rex and war hero against the Soviet Union.

 

The lifestyle

We must return to Spartan times, guided by harsh and uncompromising leaders, without compromise and without withering. The new generation, shaking up a crazy, skeptical and idealistic regime, must impose its honesty and intransigence on the country as soon as possible.

We think of the day when everything will be broken, when there will not be a moment to lose... We want to be ready for that moment. Those who will save the world", rotten with egoism and greed, are the only ones who do not count their sacrifices and who are ready, simply, every day, in the depths of their hearts, to gestures of immolation.

In life, one never wins by bargaining, by composing, by betraying one's ideal.

One wins by being loyal, by being firm in the fight and by working hard.

 

- Leon Degrelle

 

 

Our enemies are many

 

 

We have no more fundamental enemy in Europe than the Jew

 

 

 

 

The Jew has forbidden the awakening of the Aryan unconscious, imposing on it a humanitarian morality that is as stinking as it is self-destructive, through the double game of infiltration and terrorism, including military terrorism during the Second World War.

 

It is this spiritual parasitism, this Semitic imperialism, which poisons the white peoples to bring them to racial death by cultivating in them the instinct of suicide while redirecting their life impulses, notably their work, for the benefit of their racial enemies.

 

This is the whole story of the Western welfare state put at the service of Third World vermin in Europe.

 

- Démocratie Participative

 

......

 

These murderers of Christ, the Tsars and the Germans!

 

 

Saint Hitler was a man of God doing God's work

 

 

 

 

What was really at the heart of Hitler's being? It was doing God's work to help the Whites evolve within God's plan.

 

 

Goal 2033 - The End of the Quintuple Genocide Theory

 

 

 

Whites are accused of a quintuple genocide. Of having killed the Jews (1x), 2 x the Blacks through colonialism and slavery, the Muslims in Sebrenica - and fifthly via a patriarchy that would have done evil to women.

On the contrary, there is no mention of the death of 120 million Christian Europeans in unnecessary wars in the 20th century.  

This attitude is the opposite of the one we advocate. To ask ourselves in everything: "Is this good for white people?

----------

There is no physical evidence of the Holocaust for a very simple and common sense reason: it did not happen.

And why is it important for Christians to understand this?

The Jews use this false Holocaust narrative to replace Christ's suffering on the cross with the suffering of Jews at the hands of Christians in the "death camps" - so that we "repent" of our Christian "anti-Semitism" and worship the antichrist Jews instead of Christ.

- Christians for Truth

 ----------

On the uses of "Nazism" today

To be eligible for public debate

Any public figure or political party that wants to be admitted to the debate in Europe must first remove the doubt that it: a) does not like Hitler b) does not contest the Holocaust c) does not defend white identity.

 

Goal 2045 - Reconquest of Europe

 

 

 

"I gave my life to fascism."

"It is our supreme duty to fight for Spain and for a Europe now weak and liquidated by the enemy, the enemy that will always be the same, but with different masks: the Jew. For nothing is more certain than this statement: the Jew is the culprit."

- Isabel Medina Peralta 

-----------------

 

How to join?

 

 

 

Please provide us with the following information only : 

 

- Your name or nickname

- Your country

- Your age

- Gender

 

( Alexandre Bender, Suisse, 55, M ) . Head of the Swiss National Front.

 

 

 

By these means :

 

- Write to us at [e-mail]

 

- By private message on Gab Social : @FrontNationalSuisse

 

- By private message on WoldTruthMX : FrontNationalSuisse

 

Or come directly to Brussels, 44, rue de la Loi.

 

DON'T WAIT FOR AN ANSWER !

 

 

PLEASE NOTE: The flow of information from the FNS will not occur simply by joining, but only by visiting these media:

- The Front National Suisse blog

- Front National Suisse on Gab

- Front National Suisse on WorldTruthMX

 

NEWSLETTER available on each of the six petitions (1456 signatories) of the Front National Suisse on Change.org.  Check the right boxes.

-------------

Léon Degrelle: “We Dreamed Of Something Marvelous” (1974)

 

Degrelle was a charismatic Belgian political leader during the 1930s, a legendary combat hero during the Second World War, and a prolific author.

In the wake of Germany’s 1941 attack against the Soviet Union, he joined what he and many millions of oth­ers regarded as a pan-European crusade. In Belgium, he helped raise a volunteer battalion of fellow French-speaking Walloons to ensure a place of honor for his country in the “new Europe.” He rose through the ranks to become commander of the unit that finally came to be known as the 28th SS Division “Wall­onie.” During the course of his three and a half years of combat, Degrelle was wounded seven times and earned 22 military decorations. This is a short speech from 1974 by Leon Degrelle. In French, with English subtitles. Runtime: 2:45 mins. 

http://frontnationalsuisse.hautetfort.com/archive/2022/01/01/leon-degrelle-we-dreamed-of-something-marvelous-1974-6358000.html

---------------

 

SIGN the petition against germanophobie

and receive the newsletter 

of the Swiss National Front !

 Pétition · Stop germanophobie ! · Change.org

(1070 have signed)

-----------

-------------

ORIGINAL MANIFESTO IN FRENCH !

ICI le programme politique fondamental du Front National Suisse

- Et enrôlez-vous !

Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)

Манифест на русском последует!

 

EXCLUSIVE MANIFESTO - The Swiss National Front enrols! - Front National Suisse (hautetfort.com)